Usefulness and relevance
| Characteristic Name: | Usefulness and relevance |
| Dimension: | Usability and Interpretability |
| Description: | The data is useful and relevant for the task at hand |
| Granularity: | Information object |
| Implementation Type: | Process-based approach |
| Characteristic Type: | Usage |
Verification Metric:
| The number of tasks failed or under performed due to the lack of usefulness and relevance of data |
| The number of complaints received due to the lack of usefulness and relevance of data |
The implementation guidelines are guidelines to follow in regard to the characteristic. The scenarios are examples of the implementation
| Guidelines: | Scenario: |
|---|---|
| Define the content of the information object based on the user requirements (as required by the task at hand) and also considering all other compliance requirements so that the information is relevant and legitimate | (1) Customer invoice should contain information for the customer to understand his liability and for the delivery person to understand the point of delivery and the tax department to verify the applicable tax amount. |
| Regularly monitor the changes to the internal operational environment ( business process changes etc) and find out what are the new information requirements emerge due to the changes, and provide for them by amending the information structures | (1) Time stamp became an important attribute for GRNs (goods receipts notes) when Lean manufacturing started as all raw materials are expected to receive by six hours before production (GRN-record, and the time stamp -attribute) |
| Regularly monitor the changes in the external environment find out the new information requirements emerge due to such changes and provide for such data needs | (1) Competitors' rates have become important to price the existing products during the recession period since the traditional costing method does not give a competitive price. |
| Regularly check with knowledge workers to find out how their operations/decisions can be performed better with new data available to them and provide for such data in the information system | (1) An hourly working progress report is useful in identifying the bottlenecks in production lines and balance the lines |
| Monitor and measure the user satisfaction about the information provided | (1) User satisfaction survey |
Validation Metric:
| How mature is the process to maintain usefulness and relevance of data |
These are examples of how the characteristic might occur in a database.
The Definitions are examples of the characteristic that appear in the sources provided.
| Definition: | Source: |
|---|---|
| 1) The Characteristic in which the Information is the right kind of Information that adds value to the task at hand, such as to perform a process or make a decision.
2) Knowledge Workers have all the Facts they need to perform their processes or make their decisions. |
ENGLISH, L. P. 2009. Information quality applied: Best practices for improving business information, processes and systems, Wiley Publishing. |
| 1) Can the information process be adapted by the information consumer?
2)Can the information be directly applied? Is it useful? 3) Does the information provision correspond to the user’s needs and habits? |
EPPLER, M. J. 2006. Managing information quality: increasing the value of information in knowledge-intensive products and processes, Springer. |
| Relevance of data refers to the extent to which the data meets the needs of users. Information needs may change and is important that reviews take place to ensure data collected is still relevant for decision makers. | HIQA 2011. International Review of Data Quality Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Ireland. http://www.hiqa.ie/press-release/2011-04-28-international-review-data-quality. |
| Relevance is the degree to which statistics meet current and potential users’ needs. It refers to whether all statistics that are needed are produced and the extent to which concepts used (definitions, classifications etc.) | LYON, M. 2008. Assessing Data Quality , Monetary and Financial Statistics. Bank of England. http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/ statistics/Documents/ms/articles/art1mar08.pdf. |
| The data includes all of the types of information important for its use. | PRICE, R. J. & SHANKS, G. Empirical refinement of a semiotic information quality framework. System Sciences, 2005. HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2005. IEEE, 216a-216a. |
| 1) Intrinsic: The extent to which the information is new or informative in the context of a particular activity or community.
2) Relational Contextual:The amount of information contained in an information object. At the content level, it is measured as a ratio of the size of the informative content (measured in word terms that are stemmed and stopped) to the overall size of an information object. At the schema number of elements in the object level it is measured as a ratio of the number of unique elements over the total. 3) The extent to which information is applicable in a given activity. 4) The extent to which the model or schema and content of an information object are expressed by conventional, typified terms and forms according to some general-purpose reference source. |
STVILIA, B., GASSER, L., TWIDALE, M. B. & SMITH, L. C. 2007. A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1720-1733. |
| 1) Data are applicable and useful for the task at hand.
2) The quantity or volume of available data is appropriate. 3) Data are of sufficient depth, breath and scope for the task at hand. |
WANG, R. Y. & STRONG, D. M. 1996. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of management information systems, 5-33. |
Appropriate presentation
| Characteristic Name: | Appropriate presentation |
| Dimension: | Usability and Interpretability |
| Description: | The data presentation is aligned with its use |
| Granularity: | Information object |
| Implementation Type: | Process-based approach |
| Characteristic Type: | Usage |
Verification Metric:
| The number of tasks failed or under performed due to the lack of appropriate presentation of data |
| The number of complaints received due to the lack of appropriate presentation of data |
The implementation guidelines are guidelines to follow in regard to the characteristic. The scenarios are examples of the implementation
| Guidelines: | Scenario: |
|---|---|
| Ensure that Universally accepted standard formats are used to maintain the compatibility of information across organisations and across time | (1) A patients diagnostic card generated in one hospital is compatible with another hospital. |
| Ensure that information can be aggregated or combined through the use of compatible formats | (1) Product wise monthly sales report can be generated by combining the sales reports of three subsidiaries |
| Ensure that the data presentations are familiar to the users even if the application platform is changed. | (1) A quotation created in one system is sent to another system through an EDI message and displayed in the same presentation format |
| Ensure the media of presentation is appropriate for the target group | (1) A step by step written instruction list in a documents appropriate for a software engineer. (2) A video display is appropriate for a mechanic |
| Ensure that the presentation formats are flexible to accommodate changes easily | (1) An invoice document may require additional space to mansion authorisation evidence |
Validation Metric:
| How mature is the process to maintain appropriate presentation of data |
These are examples of how the characteristic might occur in a database.
| Example: | Source: |
|---|---|
| my birth date is December 13, 1941. If a personnel database has a BIRTH_DATE data element that expects dates in USA format, a date of 12/13/1941 would be correct. A date of 12/14/1941 would be inaccurate because it is the wrong value. A date of 13/12/1941 would be wrong because it is a European representation instead of a USA representation. | J. E. Olson, “Data Quality: The Accuracy Dimension”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 9 January 2003. |
The Definitions are examples of the characteristic that appear in the sources provided.
| Definition: | Source: |
|---|---|
| A measure of how information is presented to and collected from those who utilize it. Format and appearance support appropriate use of information. | D. McGilvray, “Executing Data Quality Projects: Ten Steps to Quality Data and Trusted Information”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2008. |
| 1) The Characteristic in which formatted data is presented consistently in a standardized or consistent way across different media, such as in computer screens, reports, or manually prepared reports.
2) The Characteristic of Information being presented in the right technology Media, such as online, hardcopy report, audio, or video. 3) The degree to which Information is presented in a way Intuitive and appropriate for the task at hand. The Presentation Quality of Information will vary by the individual purposes for which it is required. Some users require concise presentation, whereas others require a complete, detailed presentation, and yet others require graphic, color, or other highlighting techniques. |
ENGLISH, L. P. 2009. Information quality applied: Best practices for improving business information, processes and systems, Wiley Publishing. |
| 1) Appropriateness is the dimension we use to categorize how well the format and presentation of the data match the user needs. In our example, there is a difference between a high-level monthly sales report that is supplied to senior management and the daily product manifests that are handed to the shipping department for product packaging.
2) Flexibility in presentation describes the ability of the system to adapt to changes in both the represented information and in user requirements for presentation of information. For example, a system that display different counties; currencies may need to have the screen presentation change to allow for more significant digits for prices to be displayed when there is a steep devaluation in one county’s currency. 3) In an environment that makes use of different kinds of systems and applications, a portable interface is important so that as applications are migrated from one platform to another, the presentation of data is familiar to the users. Also, when dealing with a system designed for international use, the user of international standards as well as universally recognized icons is a sign of system designed with presentation portability in mind. |
LOSHIN, D. 2001. Enterprise knowledge management: The data quality approach, Morgan Kaufmann Pub. |
| 1) Data is presented in an intelligible manner.
2) Data is presented in a manner appropriate for its use, with respect to format, precision, and units. |
PRICE, R. J. & SHANKS, G. Empirical refinement of a semiotic information quality framework. System Sciences, 2005. HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2005. IEEE, 216a-216a. |
| Good format, like good views, are flexible so that changes in user need and recording medium can be accommodated. | REDMAN, T. C. 1997. Data quality for the information age, Artech House, Inc. |
| Data are always presented in the same format and are compatible with the previous data. | WANG, R. Y. & STRONG, D. M. 1996. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of management information systems, 5-33. |